Entries Tagged as ''

Gnome blog again

So, theoretically, I’ve gotten Gnome Blog working again. The story goes like this:

They put out a new version of Gnome Blog that supposedly supported Wordpress, the blogging software we use. However, when I tested it, it didn’t work, because it expected the URL to have /wordpress/ at the end of it, and added that to the end. Our URLs end in /dang/blog/ and /nette/blog/ due to the legacy of our Movable Type blogs. I tested linking /dang/wordpress/ to /dang/blog/, and that worked fine for posting. However, we started getting spam comments. I guess the spammers assume that /wordpress/ as well. At any rate, I removed those links, which again broke Gnome Blog.

Fast forward to today. I finally got a chance to modify the code for Gnome Blog to just take any arbitrary URL as the base for it’s Wordpress blog. Hopefully, this all works now.

Stove

Last night, we bought a new stove. It’s a ribbon element electric, so it has a smooth glass surface on it. Very nice for cleanup. Also, it has a much bigger oven, and an actual alert when it’s preheated. :) I guess we’ll have to cook something tonight…

Tomorrow, the autofair

Woo Hoo!

Patriots Rock! Look out, Pittsburg.

Misguided

Boo! Hiss! Go Patriots!

<taps>

TechTV is officially dead. G4 has dropped TechTV from it’s name, and almost the last vestiges of the old TechTV are officially gone. All that’s left is X-Play. I’m hoping that stays, but I’m not optimistic.

There once was a time that I would watch 2 or more hours of TechTV a day. Now, I’m lucky if there’s a single new episode of X-Play.

Gnome Blog

Hey, a new version of Gnome Blog is out, and it supports Wordpress! This is sweet! It means that I can go back to my easy posting from my applet, rather than via the web page…

Of course, it means the lack of fancy lists, and so on, but it’s supposed to support pictures on at least some blogs, so who knows…

There’s always the web page interface for complex stuff.

Cheap Mac

Well, Apple’s finally released a cheap Mac. It’ll be $499 for 1.25 GHz G4 w/ 40 GB, and $599 for 1.43 GHz G4 with 80 GB. That doesn’t include a keyboard, mouse, or monitor.

By comparison, Dell has a $499 P4 40 GB, and HP has a $510 Semperon 3000+ with 80 GB. So, you won’t get very good bang for your buck from this new apple. Hardly surprising, you *never* get good bang for your buck with Apple, with the possible execption of the extreme upper end, where you’d pay a huge premium from the other vendors too.

So, why is this important? This is the first Mac that’s been under $800 since I’ve started watching, probably ever. This is a big deal, because it means Apple is recognizing that they cannot increase market share with their hugely overpiced offerings, and that the market has shifted much lower over the past few years.

Does this mean I’m considering getting one? No, not really. I’m not very interested in a G4. A G5 would be interesting, because I don’t have any 64-bit archs, but I can get a faster Athlon64 for cheaper than this Mini, so that’s not attractive either. Maybe if I *liked* MacOS X, but I don’t…

Jointer

So, I got money for christmas to get tools. The one I need most is a jointer.

First, a little background. A jointer is similar to a planer, in that it has wide flat blades that take small amounts of wood off of one face or edge of a board. It’s used to either joint or face-plane a board. Jointing is getting a perfectly straight edge that is also some specific angle (usually 90 degrees) from a face. Face-planing is getting a perfectly flat face, optionally at a specific angle (usually 90 degrees) from an edge. A planer, technically a thinckness planer, cannot do either of these, because it makes one face parallel to the opposite face, which may not be flat. The ultimate goal is to use a combination of face-planing, jointing, and thickness planing to get a board that is perfectly rectangular in cross section, has perfectly straight edges, has perfectly flat faces, and has a specific thickness and width. Boards such as this are extremely important in furnature making, because you can no longer buy boards wide enough for the fields of furnature (doors, table-tops, desktops, etc.). Instead several boards need to be edge-glued to form wider boards. The edges of these boards need to be absolutely straight and square, and the thickness of these boards must be the same on all of them, or the result will not work.

Anyway, I need a jointer. This poses several problems.

First, there are three distinct classes of jointers: benchtop el-cheapo models, midrange floor models, and professional modles.

  • We can leave out the professional models right away, because they generally run over $1000 (sometimes much more), which is way out of my price range. And, they’re generally overkill for my needs, as I’m not a professional.
  • The benchtop models are cheap ($150-$250), but are very small, and generally really low quality. For example, they almost all have aluminum fences, rather than the cast iron that’s on higher end jointers, and so the fence can flex when you’re jointing a board, resulting in a bad joint. In addition, the tables on the benchtop models are generally quite short (20″ to 25″), and this makes jointing longer stock very hard, as the stock tends to tilt. Finally, the benchtop models universally have two cutter heads, rather than the three that higher end models have, and so must spin faster (~8000 RPM rather than ~5000 RPM). This results in a slighly lower quality joint, and a lot more noise and vibration. But, they’re cheap, and they might be good enough for the kind of weekend warrior stuff I plan on doing.
  • The midrange, floor models are priced *gasp* in the middle. They’re generally $450 – $650. They universally have longer tables (45″-60″), and have cast iron tables and fences. They universally have three cutter heads. They’re universally big and heavy. But, they’re capable of doing anything I might want them to do, and doing it well.

The second problem is that there has been a noticable decline in the quality of tools over the past couple of years. Tools are mostly being mass-produced in Taiwan, with much lower quality parts and worse quality control. This goes mostly across the board for tools in my price range, and is universal in the low-end benchtop set.

One possible solution to this whole mess is to buy a used jointer. I could possibly get a reasonable deal on a mid-range jointer, and get the higer quality construction of a few years ago. This looks like an ideal solution, but has several problems of it’s own. The largest is that there’s no way to guarantee I’ll ever find such a deal. Jointers are sold used only rarely, and are almost always pick-up only (or the cost of shipping is so high that it makes them more expensive than a good new one). This means that I have to find one for sale in the general local area, and such items are quite rare. Then, of course, I have to get it home. Jointers are big. They’re generally 45″-60″ by 4 feet, and 200 lbs. or so. This basically means some kind of truck, which I don’t have. That means renting one, most likely, or at least a trailer. More expense. If I buy a new one, it’ll come disassembled (if I buy locally), or be shipped (if I buy on Amazon), so I don’t have to worry about picking it up.

So, the big question is, do I buy the cheap, benchtop version, and risk it being inadequate? If it works, I’ll have saved a considerable amount of time and hassle, and a fair amount of space in my shop. Or, do I buy a new midrange? It’s expensive, but it’ll be shipped, and should work fine. Or, do I wait, and hope for a local sale of a good jointer? I still haven’t decided. I guess first I’ll go to the various stores that sell them locally and look at and touch the ones they have. That might help me decide.