Entries Tagged as ''

No broadcast flag?

A while ago, the FCC mandated that, by mid 2005, all devices capable of receiving digital broadcasts must detect and honor the broadcast flag. This is a flag on the broadcast that indicates that the particular program may not be recorded in any form. Basically, it allows the networks to decide that you cannot record any TV you watch, you must watch it live or not at all. This has caused much furor in the tech community, which follows such things. Among other things, it means no digital VCRs, no TiVo like devices, no ability to fast forward through commercials, no ability to pause to go to the bathroom. Consumers would be completely at the mercy of the networks as to when and how they could watch television.

Now, it’s looking like this might not happen after all. A group of consumer watchdog groups, including the EFF, have filed a lawsuit saying that the FCC overstepped it’s authority, and it’s looking like the judges agree. Is there a chance that we’ll be able to keep some control over our TV watching? Or will congress step in, as it has so many times in the past, and rape our personal freedoms on behalf of the large corporations?

Vacation

Back from vacation in Disney World. It was very nice, although not particularly relaxing. Disney World seems to be always go go go. The weather was great, tho, and it was extremely nice to have sunshine and warmth during the cold, dreary months of late winter.

On the minus side, just over 5000 emails when I got back, over 2000 of which were spam. :( And the blog spammers hit us really hard while we were gone. I really have to find a way to block trackbacks entirely…

More Colors!

According to this blog entry, the change in Solaris 10 that resulted in the most user gratitude was changing the default bitdepth on the X server to 24. :)

Superbowl

Bravo Pats!

It just goes to show that teams can still win, in this day and age of superstars.

TV shows’ titles

Today, Janette was watching her DVDs of Wonderfalls. This is one of several shows that she loves that were canceled early, despite having a rabid following. Firefly comes to mind as another.

Now, what’s the difference between these shows and the ones that make it big? One thing that struck me is the title. Take the current biggest hit, Desperate Housewives. The title sells the entire show. Or, the previous biggest hit: CSI. Again, good solid name that tells what the show is about and attracts viewers. Survivor. Bad show, great title. Who Want’s to be a Millionaire? Who doesn’t? Sex in the City? Please! Trading Spaces, Modern Marvels, Crossfire, The Man Show, Cops, Lois and Clark, the list goes on. Successful shows, great names.

Some of the longest running shows have great titles. Game shows come and go, but Jeopardy lives forever. Remember The Arsenio Hall show? Gone, but The Tonight Show lives on. Everyone knows that the best show on Saturday is Saturday Night Live.

This extends even into comedy. Friends is a great title. The King of Queens, too. DAG, not so much. Which of these three didn’t last a season?

Of course, this isn’t a hard and fast rule. Some shows with horrible titles do very well. Everybody Loves Raymond comes to mind. But a good name predisposes a show to do well. Does anyone think that Desperate Housewives would have taken over the top spot in half a season if it had been called The Gina Show? No, definitely not.

Which brings us back to Wonderfalls. Frankly, that’s not a great title. Plus, the concept is to similar to Joan of Arcadia (a somewhat better title, as Joan of Arc also heard the voice of God). Of these two, the one with the better title is still on, while the one with the worse title is gone. Even if it was a better show.

Spams back

Well, the blog spam is back, this time in the form of trackbacks. I wonder if I can find these spammers and kick them in the nuts a hundred thousand or so times? Maybe I’ll turn off trackbacks. They haven’t been useful for anything so far other than spamming…