<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Turion, baby!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 20:43:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2005 02:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/#comment-303</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard rumors that 8.13.6 has full acceleration, but I haven&#039;t tried it yet myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard rumors that 8.13.6 has full acceleration, but I haven&#8217;t tried it yet myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vess Bakalov</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Vess Bakalov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/#comment-302</guid>
		<description>So has anyone figured out a good kernel/ati-driver combo?  I am still stuck with 2.6.11-r1 and 8.13.4.  Acceleration does not work, and neither does power mgmt.  At least resolution is native.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So has anyone figured out a good kernel/ati-driver combo?  I am still stuck with 2.6.11-r1 and 8.13.4.  Acceleration does not work, and neither does power mgmt.  At least resolution is native.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John (J5) Palmieri</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>John (J5) Palmieri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/#comment-301</guid>
		<description>Hey just got this laptop.  I like it a lot.  I was wondering if you had any luck with the wireless mini-pci card.  Some bios whitelist cards and I am hoping this one doesn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey just got this laptop.  I like it a lot.  I was wondering if you had any luck with the wireless mini-pci card.  Some bios whitelist cards and I am hoping this one doesn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vess Bakalov</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Vess Bakalov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>It got better after a few kernel rebuilds.  Right now I am blaming DMA and some K8 options that I did not turn on.
  Still using 2.6.11-r1.  Tried 2.6.12-r6 and r7, but could not get X to load.  fglrx causes a kernel panic.  On 2.6.12 apci works great.  Got powernowd to work (on 2.6.11 powernowd segfaults) .  Still without X it is somewhat useless.
  Using the 8.13.4 ati-drivers I got some semblance of accelaration going, but it is pretty bad still.  I got 400fps on glxgears earlier, but after I finished messing with the kernels I am down to 200fps.  It says that ATI is loaded...  OH!  It may be the double-speed time!  I had noapic earlier, and I have it on now, so maybe it is calculating wrong.
  I still have not managed to get ndiswrapper working with the Broadcom.  I am using a Cisco Aironet 350 which came right up.  I want the goodness of a built-in to 802.11g.  The Aironet is only 802.11b and sticks out...

Cant wait to see your page on this laptop.  I might end up puting one together as well, once I get my machine to a somewhat satisfactory condition.

8/11 Newark, DE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It got better after a few kernel rebuilds.  Right now I am blaming DMA and some K8 options that I did not turn on.<br />
  Still using 2.6.11-r1.  Tried 2.6.12-r6 and r7, but could not get X to load.  fglrx causes a kernel panic.  On 2.6.12 apci works great.  Got powernowd to work (on 2.6.11 powernowd segfaults) .  Still without X it is somewhat useless.<br />
  Using the 8.13.4 ati-drivers I got some semblance of accelaration going, but it is pretty bad still.  I got 400fps on glxgears earlier, but after I finished messing with the kernels I am down to 200fps.  It says that ATI is loaded&#8230;  OH!  It may be the double-speed time!  I had noapic earlier, and I have it on now, so maybe it is calculating wrong.<br />
  I still have not managed to get ndiswrapper working with the Broadcom.  I am using a Cisco Aironet 350 which came right up.  I want the goodness of a built-in to 802.11g.  The Aironet is only 802.11b and sticks out&#8230;</p>
<p>Cant wait to see your page on this laptop.  I might end up puting one together as well, once I get my machine to a somewhat satisfactory condition.</p>
<p>8/11 Newark, DE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/#comment-299</guid>
		<description>I certainly don&#039;t see this, although it was bad before I booted with noapic (the clock was running double speed, and everything was slugish)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I certainly don&#8217;t see this, although it was bad before I booted with noapic (the clock was running double speed, and everything was slugish)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vess Bakalov</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Vess Bakalov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 13:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/#comment-298</guid>
		<description>Well, I also got the V2311US, and I got Gentoo on it, and I got the video and the touchpoint working (thanks for the tip on the ATI drivers).
  I have a problem with multitasking.  The machine seems to be totally incapable of doing more than one thing at a time.  If I am compiling, the mouse is jumpy, the keyboard is not responsive and refresh takes.... forever.
  I know I have only 512MB RAM, and that 128 are gone to the 200M Video card.  Still - my Dell C600 (1Ghz PIII with 256 RAM) performs better at switching tasks.
  Is anyone else observing this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I also got the V2311US, and I got Gentoo on it, and I got the video and the touchpoint working (thanks for the tip on the ATI drivers).<br />
  I have a problem with multitasking.  The machine seems to be totally incapable of doing more than one thing at a time.  If I am compiling, the mouse is jumpy, the keyboard is not responsive and refresh takes&#8230;. forever.<br />
  I know I have only 512MB RAM, and that 128 are gone to the 200M Video card.  Still &#8211; my Dell C600 (1Ghz PIII with 256 RAM) performs better at switching tasks.<br />
  Is anyone else observing this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ciaranm</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>ciaranm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/07/26/turion-baby/#comment-297</guid>
		<description>You can pass -dpi whatever to your X server to get around broken font sizes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can pass -dpi whatever to your X server to get around broken font sizes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

