<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gentoo News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 20:43:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: x</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/comment-page-1/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>x</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/#comment-346</guid>
		<description>I think this whole thing is like adding feature to fill a hole that shouldn&#039;t be there in the first place.
Clean design is not made up by filling holes.. certainly not by spamming news around. What does it serves a purpose for if 50% (of the devs even!) disable it? It means it&#039;s wrong and shouldn&#039;t be used. Even if it was 25% it would still show it, for the blind one, as far as statistics sucks.

More energy should be put, maybe, into that portageng or whatever it is now, to handle the einfo and all that stuff the way it should. Even if that takes a few monthes instead of a 15min news hack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this whole thing is like adding feature to fill a hole that shouldn&#8217;t be there in the first place.<br />
Clean design is not made up by filling holes.. certainly not by spamming news around. What does it serves a purpose for if 50% (of the devs even!) disable it? It means it&#8217;s wrong and shouldn&#8217;t be used. Even if it was 25% it would still show it, for the blind one, as far as statistics sucks.</p>
<p>More energy should be put, maybe, into that portageng or whatever it is now, to handle the einfo and all that stuff the way it should. Even if that takes a few monthes instead of a 15min news hack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dieterv</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/comment-page-1/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>dieterv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 12:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/#comment-345</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not following all the details around the proposal, so don&#039;t shoot me if this has already been discussed.
Aren&#039;t new features to portage supposed to have a FEATURES flag in make.conf? Pretty simple actually, if news is defined in FEATURES portage shows the news. Otherwise it keeps quiet. Then once a new profile is created (2006.1 for example) it can be enabled by default, and people not wanting news define -news in make.conf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not following all the details around the proposal, so don&#8217;t shoot me if this has already been discussed.<br />
Aren&#8217;t new features to portage supposed to have a FEATURES flag in make.conf? Pretty simple actually, if news is defined in FEATURES portage shows the news. Otherwise it keeps quiet. Then once a new profile is created (2006.1 for example) it can be enabled by default, and people not wanting news define -news in make.conf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: postmodern</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/comment-page-1/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>postmodern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 03:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/#comment-344</guid>
		<description>It almost seems as if we need some sort of subscription mechanism to allow users to instruct this news service what information they would like to view, if any. If the news is going to come in the ebuilds or appended to them in some NEWS file, maybe a PORTAGE_NEWS option should be introduced or yet-another USE-flag?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It almost seems as if we need some sort of subscription mechanism to allow users to instruct this news service what information they would like to view, if any. If the news is going to come in the ebuilds or appended to them in some NEWS file, maybe a PORTAGE_NEWS option should be introduced or yet-another USE-flag?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/comment-page-1/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 01:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/#comment-343</guid>
		<description>For the record, I was not responding to GLEP 42 (which I have not read), I was responding to the post I referenced, and the sentiments there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I was not responding to GLEP 42 (which I have not read), I was responding to the post I referenced, and the sentiments there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ciaranm</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>ciaranm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 00:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Heh, GLEP 42 addresses both of those concerns. You&#039;ll only get Apache news on boxes using Apache, and disabling news is one documented line in a config file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, GLEP 42 addresses both of those concerns. You&#8217;ll only get Apache news on boxes using Apache, and disabling news is one documented line in a config file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tarmo</title>
		<link>http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 00:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/11/11/gentoo-news/#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t the news supposed to only show up if you actually upgrade or have the package that the news is about? ...So you&#039;d only see apache news if you use apache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the news supposed to only show up if you actually upgrade or have the package that the news is about? &#8230;So you&#8217;d only see apache news if you use apache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

