Comments on: Gnome 2.13.3 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/12/15/gnome-2133/ Tue, 10 May 2011 20:43:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Daniel http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/12/15/gnome-2133/comment-page-1/#comment-355 Daniel Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:36:39 +0000 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/12/15/gnome-2133/#comment-355 Sure, just make sure it's assigned to me and not the gnome herd. Sure, just make sure it’s assigned to me and not the gnome herd.

]]> By: Ed Catmur http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/12/15/gnome-2133/comment-page-1/#comment-354 Ed Catmur Fri, 16 Dec 2005 05:54:01 +0000 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/12/15/gnome-2133/#comment-354 Ah, but they don't have @gentoo.org accounts. btw, I've found a sandbox vio in gnopernicus 1.0 - is it OK to open a bug on bugs.gentoo.org and assign it to you? Ah, but they don’t have @gentoo.org accounts.

btw, I’ve found a sandbox vio in gnopernicus 1.0 – is it OK to open a bug on bugs.gentoo.org and assign it to you?

]]> By: SchAmane http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/12/15/gnome-2133/comment-page-1/#comment-353 SchAmane Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:59:20 +0000 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2005/12/15/gnome-2133/#comment-353 There is already another portage with 2.13.3 in. http://www.breakmygentoo.net/ There is already another portage with 2.13.3 in.
http://www.breakmygentoo.net/

]]>