Comments on: PolicyKit unmasked http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/ Tue, 10 May 2011 20:43:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: MiKeL http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/comment-page-1/#comment-1231 MiKeL Sat, 18 Apr 2009 14:08:11 +0000 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/#comment-1231 s/have packagekit hard disabled/have policykit hard disabled/ s/have packagekit hard disabled/have policykit hard disabled/

]]> By: dagger http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/comment-page-1/#comment-1230 dagger Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:16:20 +0000 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/#comment-1230 The fun part begins. Now it's time to sort out profiles/package.mask and profiles/base/package.use.mask Thanks for unmasking it. Rob The fun part begins. Now it’s time to sort out profiles/package.mask and profiles/base/package.use.mask

Thanks for unmasking it.

Rob

]]> By: Pacho Ramos http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/comment-page-1/#comment-1229 Pacho Ramos Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:00:58 +0000 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/#comment-1229 OK, thanks for the info, I will wait a bit for now to update to gnome 2.26 as it's the desktop used by most of my users, then, it needs to be "stable" :-) Thanks a lot OK, thanks for the info, I will wait a bit for now to update to gnome 2.26 as it’s the desktop used by most of my users, then, it needs to be “stable” :-)

Thanks a lot

]]> By: Daniel http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/comment-page-1/#comment-1228 Daniel Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:00:53 +0000 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/#comment-1228 We are. It's sometimes a bit of work to get upstream to accept them, but we are certainly trying. GNOME moving to git will help; we can maintain our patches in a git branch, and make them easier to keep up-to-date and easier to push into gnome. We are. It’s sometimes a bit of work to get upstream to accept them, but we are certainly trying.

GNOME moving to git will help; we can maintain our patches in a git branch, and make them easier to keep up-to-date and easier to push into gnome.

]]> By: foo http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/comment-page-1/#comment-1227 foo Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:47:44 +0000 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/#comment-1227 Please send those GNOME patches upstream. Please send those GNOME patches upstream.

]]> By: Daniel http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/comment-page-1/#comment-1226 Daniel Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:29:25 +0000 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/#comment-1226 At this time, there are no plans to add policykit to 2.24 Completely aside from the work, 2.24 is stable and policykit is not. At this time, there are no plans to add policykit to 2.24

Completely aside from the work, 2.24 is stable and policykit is not.

]]> By: Pacho Ramos http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/comment-page-1/#comment-1225 Pacho Ramos Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:27:35 +0000 http://gryniewicz.com/blogs/dang/2009/04/17/policykit-unmasked/#comment-1225 Only for information, Will polkit support be added to gnome-2.24 or I will have to update to 2.26 for being able to use policykit in more apps (for now, I am only using it with networkmanager) Thanks :-) Only for information, Will polkit support be added to gnome-2.24 or I will have to update to 2.26 for being able to use policykit in more apps (for now, I am only using it with networkmanager)

Thanks :-)

]]>